Readerly Judgments Of Reliability

Readerly Judgments of Reliability is a theoretical construct in narrative theory that refers to the evaluative processes through which readers assess the credibility and trustworthiness of a narrator's account by identifying discrepancies between the narrator's testimony and implied or textual evidence.

6

Publications

306

Citations

9

Authors

2

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Authors

9

  1. PM
    Paul McCormick

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. KK
    Karin Kukkonen

    University of Oslo, Norway

    1 publications · 93 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. JP
    J. P. Das

    University of Alberta, Canada

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. RR
    R. Rath

    University of St Andrews, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. TV
    Taylor Voges

    University of Georgia, United States

    1 publications · 40 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 9

Institutions

2

  1. University of Turku

    Turku, Finland

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    93 citations

  2. Texas Christian University

    Fort Worth, United States

    1 h-index

    2 publications

    80 citations

1–2 of 2

Venues

  1. Poetics Today

    2 publications · 70 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. 1

    h-index

  3. Public Relations Review

    1 publications · 40 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Style

    1 publications · 90 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5