Concepedia

Qualitative Card Sorting Analysis

Qualitative Card Sorting Analysis is a methodological approach within user experience research that employs inductive thematic analysis of participants' sorting behaviors and verbalized reasoning to uncover underlying cognitive structures and patterns in how individuals categorize information, thereby distinguishing it from quantitative card sorting through its focus on interpretive, non-numerical insights.

17

Publications

567

Citations

72

Authors

54

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

4

Parents

Publications

17

Making sense of card sorting data

Sally Fincher, Josh Tenenberg · Expert Systems · 2005 · 195 citations

, , +16

Using edit distance to analyze card sorts

Katherine Deibel, Richard Anderson, Ruth A. Anderson · Expert Systems · 2005 · 52 citations · Full text

, , +12

Open card sorting and factor analysis: a usability case study

Krystal M. Lewis, Peter Hepburn · The Electronic Library · 2010 · 45 citations

, , +17

Design Card Sets

Tessa Aarts, Linas Kristupas Gabrielaitis, Lianne C. de Jong et al. · 2020 · 44 citations · Full text

, , +14

New approaches to qualitative interviewing: Development of a card sort technique to understand subjective patterns of symptoms and responses

Jennifer R. Mammen, Sally A. Norton, Hyekyun Rhee et al. · International Journal of Nursing Studies · 2016 · 34 citations

, , +12

1–5 of 17

Authors

72

  1. JT
    Josh Tenenberg

    University of Washington Tacoma, United States

    2 publications · 225 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. RA
    Ruth A. Anderson

    Duke University, United States

    2 publications · 82 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. SF
    Sally Fincher

    University of Kent, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 225 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. GD
    Guilherme Del Fiol

    University of Utah, United States

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. MW
    Michael Whang

    Western Michigan University, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 72

Institutions

54

  1. University of Washington

    Seattle, United States

    3 h-index

    6 publications

    411 citations

  2. University of Kent

    Canterbury, United Kingdom

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    225 citations

  3. Michigan State University

    East Lansing, United States

    2 h-index

    5 publications

    54 citations

  4. University of Washington Tacoma

    Tacoma, United States

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    225 citations

  5. University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, United States

    2 h-index

    4 publications

    164 citations

  6. University of Arizona

    Tucson, United States

    2 h-index

    3 publications

    54 citations

  7. Duke Medical Center

    Durham, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    13 citations

  8. Utrecht University

    Utrecht, The Netherlands

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    23 citations

1–8 of 54

Venues

  1. Expert Systems

    4 publications · 291 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. The Electronic Library

    1 publications · 45 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

    Repository · 1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. International Journal of Nursing Studies

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

    JAMIA · 1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5