Concepedia

Proportionality Review

Proportionality Review is a principle of judicial scrutiny that belongs to the genus of standards of review in administrative law, distinguished by its systematic assessment of whether an administrative decision’s intensity, necessity, and balance of conflicting interests are commensurate with the legitimate objective pursued.

40

Publications

1.8K

Citations

46

Authors

29

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

3

Variants

Proportionality Analysis

Parents

Children

Publications

40

PROPORTIONALITY AND VARIABLE INTENSITY OF REVIEW

Julian Rivers · The Cambridge Law Journal · 2006 · 297 citations

, , +12

The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review

Mattias Kumm · Law & Ethics of Human Rights · 2010 · 251 citations

, , +9

Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality

Vicki C. Jackson · 2015 · 156 citations · Full text

, , +8

Indirect Expropriation and the Right to Regulate: Revisiting Proportionality Analysis and the Standard of Review in Investor-State Arbitration

Caroline Henckels · Journal of International Economic Law · 2012 · 87 citations

, , +12

Proportionality in EU Law: A Balancing Act?

Wolf Sauter · SSRN Electronic Journal · 2013 · 73 citations · Full text

, , +17

1–5 of 40

Authors

46

  1. WS
    Wolf Sauter

    Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands

    3 publications · 146 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. DH
    Darren Harvey

    Charles Darwin University, Australia

    2 publications · 57 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. MK
    Mattias Kumm

    New York University, United States

    2 publications · 272 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. AP
    Andrea Pin

    University of Padua, Italy

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. YS
    Yuval Shany

    Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

    1 publications · 63 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 46

Institutions

29

  1. University of Cambridge

    Cambridge, United Kingdom

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    130 citations

  2. Tilburg University

    Tilburg, The Netherlands

    2 h-index

    3 publications

    111 citations

  3. University of Oxford

    Oxford, United Kingdom

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    72 citations

  4. Chinese University of Hong Kong

    Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    25 citations

  5. Rogers (United States)

    Windham, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    10 citations

  6. University of Wisconsin–Madison

    Madison, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    32 citations

  7. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    73 citations

  8. Queen's University Belfast

    Belfast, United Kingdom

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    16 citations

1–8 of 29

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 3 publications · 108 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. National Municipal Review

    2 publications · 46 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. The Cambridge Law Journal

    2 publications · 340 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies

    2 publications · 73 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Leiden Journal of International Law

    2 publications · 101 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5