Proportionality In Interpretation

Proportionality in Interpretation is a principle of legal hermeneutics that belongs to the genus of interpretive standards and is differentiated by its function of ensuring that the consequences of a statutory or constitutional interpretation are commensurate with the ends sought, thereby balancing competing legal values in a manner that minimizes unjustified impairments.

25

Publications

1.6K

Citations

26

Authors

19

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

3

Authors

26

  1. KM
    K. Moller

    London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 190 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. GD
    Gráinne de Búrca

    New York University, United States

    2 publications · 209 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. RA
    Robert Alexy

    Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. AF
    Alkmene Fotiadou

    European Faculty of Law, Slovenia

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. RW
    Rudolf Wendt

    Saarland University, Germany

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 26

Venues

  1. International Journal of Constitutional Law

    4 publications · 232 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 3 publications · 62 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

    3 publications · 163 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. European Law Journal

    2 publications · 343 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. European Journal of International Law

    EJIL · 2 publications · 55 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5