Procedure Appropriateness
Procedure Appropriateness is a normative evaluation criterion within the academic context of Procedure Utilization that determines the suitability and validity of a procedural contribution—such as a method, model, framework, or metric—for a given research purpose or domain application based on established theoretical, empirical, or methodological standards.
43
Publications
4.8K
Citations
246
Authors
149
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
8
Parents
43
Suzanne M. Connolly, Diane R. Baker, Brett M. Coldiron et al. · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2012 · 531 citations · Full text
Medicine, Dermatology, Surgery +14
When Do Rules of Procedure Matter?
Kenneth A. Shepsle, Barry R. Weingast · The Journal of Politics · 1984 · 152 citations
Measuring the Necessity of Medical Procedures
James P. Kahan, Steven J. Bernstein, Lucian L. Leape et al. · Medical Care · 1994 · 144 citations
1–5 of 43
246
5
h-index
5
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 246
149
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, United States
4 h-index
14 publications
783 citations
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, United States
3 h-index
4 publications
727 citations

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, United States
3 h-index
8 publications
755 citations
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, United States
3 h-index
9 publications
397 citations
Yale University
New Haven, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
693 citations
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
670 citations
Georgetown University
Washington, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
659 citations
Saint Vincent Hospital
Erie, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
659 citations
1–8 of 149
5 publications · 164 citations
5
h-index
Repository · 3 publications · 72 citations
3
h-index
2 publications · 64 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 42 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 155 citations
2
h-index
1–5