Post-legislative Review

Post-Legislative Review is a formal evaluative process, belonging to the broader category of legislative oversight mechanisms, that systematically assesses the operation, efficacy, and impact of enacted legislation to determine whether its intended objectives have been achieved and whether amendments, repeal, or continuation are warranted.

19

Publications

569

Citations

27

Authors

20

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

8

Variants

Post-legislative Scrutiny

Authors

27

  1. JW
    Justin Wedeking

    University of Kentucky, United States

    1 publications · 75 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. BC
    Beverley Clough

    University of Leeds, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 70 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. JA
    Janaina Almeida Giani

    Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. EG
    Elena Griglio

    Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli, Italy

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. TC
    Thomas Caygill

    Newcastle University, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 27

Venues

  1. Journal of Legislative Studies

    JLS · 3 publications · 50 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. Twentieth-Century China

    2 publications · 23 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. Jurnal Konstitusi

    2 publications · 56 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Diogenes

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Common Market Law Review

    CMLR · 1 publications · 22 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5