Post-chevron Jurisprudence

Post-Chevron Jurisprudence is a body of legal scholarship and judicial interpretation that constitutes the analytical framework emerging after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., distinguished by its critical reexamination of administrative agency deference and the shifting doctrinal approaches to statutory ambiguity and executive authority.

6

Publications

296

Citations

3

Authors

3

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

3

  1. CR
    Cass R. Sunstein

    Harvard University, United States

    4 publications · 252 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. RJ
    Richard J. Pierce

    Shenandoah University, United States

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. KW
    Kenneth W. Starr

    Yale University, United States

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. DA
    Daniel Aaron

    Harvard University, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    0

    h-index

  5. AE
    Avery E. Emery

    University of Utah, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    0

    h-index

1–5 of 3

Institutions

3

Venues

  1. Yale journal on regulation

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Virginia Law Review

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Vanderbilt law review

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Columbia Law Review

    1 publications · 111 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. JAMA

    1 publications · 11 citations

1–5