Concepedia

Pore Space Utilization

Pore Space Utilization is a geophysical metric that quantifies the proportion of subsurface pore volume within a geological formation effectively occupied by injected carbon dioxide relative to the total available pore space, serving as a key indicator of storage efficiency and reservoir performance in geologic carbon storage operations.

39

Publications

3.4K

Citations

157

Authors

87

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

15

Parents

Publications

39

Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation: What, How, and Why?

Bin Li, Hui‐Min Wen, Wei Zhou et al. · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2014 · 621 citations

, , +17

Lessons learned from 14 years of CCS operations: Sleipner, In Salah and Snøhvit

Ola Eiken, Philip Ringrose, Christian Hermanrud et al. · Energy Procedia · 2011 · 424 citations · Full text

, , +15

Onshore Geologic Storage of CO <sub>2</sub>

Franklin M. Orr · Science · 2009 · 386 citations

, , +15

An energy budget for Porites porites (Scleractinia)

Peter J. Edmunds, P. Spencer Davies · Marine Biology · 1986 · 226 citations

, , +13

Maturing global CO2 storage resources on offshore continental margins to achieve 2DS emissions reductions

Philip Ringrose, T. A. Meckel · Scientific Reports · 2019 · 150 citations · Full text

, , +17

1–5 of 39

Authors

157

  1. JL
    Jing Li

    Yantai University, China

    2 publications · 69 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. YZ
    Yining Zhang

    Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

    2 publications · 69 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. QL
    Qinzhi Lai

    Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

    2 publications · 69 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. PR
    Philip Ringrose

    Equinor (Norway), Norway

    2 publications · 574 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. HZ
    Huamin Zhang

    Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, China

    2 publications · 69 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 157

Institutions

87

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences

    Beijing, China

    3 h-index

    16 publications

    540 citations

  2. The University of Texas at Austin

    Austin, United States

    2 h-index

    7 publications

    438 citations

  3. Shell (Netherlands)

    The Hague, The Netherlands

    2 h-index

    5 publications

    557 citations

  4. The University of Texas at San Antonio

    San Antonio, United States

    2 h-index

    8 publications

    2.5K citations

  5. Equinor (Norway)

    Stavanger, Norway

    2 h-index

    7 publications

    2.7K citations

  6. Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics

    Dalian, China

    2 h-index

    13 publications

    429 citations

  7. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

    Beijing, China

    2 h-index

    5 publications

    153 citations

  8. Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy

    Dalian, China

    2 h-index

    13 publications

    429 citations

1–8 of 87

Venues

  1. Energy Procedia

    3 publications · 488 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. 3

    h-index

  3. HortScience

    2 publications · 51 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Journal of the American Chemical Society

    JACS · 1 publications · 119 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. RSC Advances

    2 publications · 52 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5