Polemical Exegesis

Polemical Exegesis is a hermeneutic method within Buddhist textual interpretation that systematically employs critical argumentation to delineate doctrinal boundaries by exposing perceived inconsistencies in rival philosophical or sectarian readings of canonical texts.

20

Publications

727

Citations

19

Authors

6

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

19

  1. GG
    Gary G. Porton

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. FT
    F Talmage

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. DH
    David H. Wollman

    Harvard University, United States

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. GV
    Gérard Vallée

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. PM
    Peter Marshall

    University of Warwick, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 62 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 19

Venues

  1. Augustinian Studies

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. American Journal of Archaeology

    1 publications · 25 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Journal of the history of philosophy

    JHP · 1 publications · 61 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. The American Historical Review

    AHR · 1 publications · 168 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. New Blackfriars

    1 publications · 23 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5