Peer Review Manipulation

Peer Review Manipulation is a form of research misconduct involving the unethical interference with the editorial review process by falsifying, fabricating, or inappropriately influencing reviewer identities or comments to gain unfair advantage in publication outcomes.

13

Publications

375

Citations

31

Authors

20

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

9

Authors

31

  1. NB
    Nihar B. Shah

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    4 publications · 71 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. XS
    Xiaofei Shi

    Carnegie Mellon University, United States

    2 publications · 35 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. YX
    Yichong Xu

    Microsoft (United States), United States

    2 publications · 35 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. FF
    Fei Fang

    Inha University, South Korea

    2 publications · 36 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. RL
    Ryan Liu

    Carnegie Mellon University, United States

    2 publications · 36 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 31

Venues

  1. arXiv (Cornell University)

    Repository · 2 publications · 34 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering

    SAJCE · 1 publications · 25 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Neural Information Processing Systems

    Conference · 1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Energy Reports

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. American Journal of Psychiatry

    1 publications · 27 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5