Peer Review Manipulation
Peer Review Manipulation is a form of research misconduct involving the unethical interference with the editorial review process by falsifying, fabricating, or inappropriately influencing reviewer identities or comments to gain unfair advantage in publication outcomes.
13
Publications
375
Citations
31
Authors
20
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
9
Parents
13
Heri Septya Kusuma, Mahfud Mahfud · South African Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016 · 25 citations · Full text
1–5 of 13
31
4
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 31
20
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, United States
4 h-index
16 publications
282 citations
Duke University
Durham, United States
2 h-index
4 publications
72 citations

Universidad de Guadalajara
Guadalajara, Mexico
1 h-index
1 publications
81 citations
Metropolitan Community College
Omaha, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
16 citations

University of Oslo
Oslo, Norway
1 h-index
1 publications
17 citations
Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology
Surabaya, Indonesia
1 h-index
2 publications
50 citations
Tsinghua University
Beijing, China
1 h-index
2 publications
30 citations
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
69 citations
1–8 of 20
Repository · 2 publications · 34 citations
2
h-index
SAJCE · 1 publications · 25 citations
1
h-index
Conference · 1 publications · 13 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 16 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 27 citations
1
h-index
1–5