Peer Debriefing
Peer debriefing is a qualitative research appraisal method in which a researcher engages in systematic reflection and discussion with a disinterested peer to enhance the credibility and rigor of the research findings by identifying potential biases, assumptions, and interpretive distortions.
91
Publications
6.8K
Citations
268
Authors
174
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
31
91
Rigour in qualitative case-study research
Catherine Houghton, Dympna Casey, David Shaw et al. · Nurse Researcher · 2013 · 816 citations
1–5 of 91
268
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 268
174

Chung-Ang University
Seoul, South Korea
3 h-index
4 publications
142 citations

Northern Illinois University
DeKalb, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
208 citations
University of Delaware
Newark, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
29 citations

Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway
Galway, Ireland
2 h-index
4 publications
2.5K citations

Old Dominion University
Norfolk, United States
2 h-index
4 publications
158 citations
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, United States
2 h-index
5 publications
250 citations
Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System
Peoria, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
127 citations

McMaster University
Hamilton, Canada
2 h-index
8 publications
480 citations
1–8 of 174
Repository · 7 publications · 246 citations
7
h-index
JTPE · 3 publications · 794 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 124 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 81 citations
3
h-index
JNE · 2 publications · 109 citations
2
h-index
1–5