Overbreadth Doctrine

The Overbreadth Doctrine is a judicial principle in constitutional law that invalidates a statute as unconstitutional if it restricts substantially more speech than necessary to achieve a compelling government interest, thereby chilling protected expression under the First Amendment.

5

Publications

78

Citations

9

Authors

3

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

9

  1. HS
    Hamish Stewart

    University of Toronto, Canada

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. LO
    Lord Overstone

    1 publications · 26 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. DS
    David Spring

    1 publications · 26 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. RW
    Rebecca West

    Welsh Government, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. WT
    Whitaker T. Deininger

    San Jose State University, United States

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 9

Institutions

3

Venues

  1. The American Historical Review

    AHR · 1 publications · 26 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. McGill Law Journal

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. The Yale Law Journal

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. The Western Political Quarterly

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5