Overbreadth Doctrine
The Overbreadth Doctrine is a judicial principle in constitutional law that invalidates a statute as unconstitutional if it restricts substantially more speech than necessary to achieve a compelling government interest, thereby chilling protected expression under the First Amendment.
5
Publications
78
Citations
9
Authors
3
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
0
Variants
Overbreadth
Parents
Children
Associational OverbreadthCommercial Speech OverbreadthFacial Overbreadth ChallengeLeast Restrictive Means AnalysisProtected Speech AnalysisRemedial Limits On Invalidating LawsStanding In Overbreadth CasesStatutory Narrowing ConstructionSubstantial Overbreadth DoctrineSubstantial State Interest Test
5
Larry Alexander · Digital USD (University of San Diego) · 2010 · 28 citations · Full text
Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law +12
The Correspondence of Lord Overstone
David Spring, Lord Overstone, D. P. O’Brien · The American Historical Review · 1973 · 26 citations
Bedford and the Structure of Section 7
Hamish Stewart · McGill Law Journal · 2015 · 17 citations · Full text
Whitaker T. Deininger, Rebecca West · The Western Political Quarterly · 1966 · 15 citations
Henry Paul Monaghan · The Supreme Court Review · 1981 · 12 citations · Full text
Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law +13
1–5 of 5
9
1
h-index
1 publications · 26 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 26 citations
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 9
3

Cornell University
Ithaca, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
10 citations
Princeton Public Schools
Princeton, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
10 citations
Princeton University
Princeton, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
10 citations

University of San Diego
San Diego, United States
1 publications
28 citations
1–4 of 3
AHR · 1 publications · 26 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 17 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 10 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 15 citations
1
h-index
Repository · 1 publications · 10 citations
1
h-index
1–5