Oer Review Processes

OER Review Processes is a systematic evaluation framework designed to assess the quality, accuracy, accessibility, and pedagogical effectiveness of Open Educational Resources through predefined criteria and stakeholder feedback mechanisms.

18

Publications

660

Citations

47

Authors

25

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

10

Authors

47

  1. HB
    Helen Beetham

    University of Bristol, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 63 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. AL
    Allison Littlejohn

    Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 63 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. IF
    Isobel Falconer

    Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 63 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. TM
    Teresa M. Chan

    McMaster University, Canada

    2 publications · 38 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. CL
    Colin Latchem

    Open Universities Australia, Australia

    1 publications · 35 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 47

Venues

  1. 2

    h-index

  2. 2

    h-index

  3. Perspectives on Medical Education

    PME · 1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Information Discovery and Delivery

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. AEM Education and Training

    1 publications · 23 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5