Normative Separation Thesis

The Normative Separation Thesis is a theoretical framework within legal and moral philosophy that distinguishes normative moral principles from legal rules by asserting that the validity of law does not depend on its moral correctness, thereby demarcating the domain of legal obligation from ethical evaluation.

22

Publications

5.5K

Citations

21

Authors

10

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

3

Authors

21

  1. RE
    R. Edward Freeman

    University of Virginia, United States

    4 publications · 3K citations

    4

    h-index

  2. JL
    Jules L. Coleman

    Yale University, United States

    2 publications · 71 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. JD
    Jared D. Harris

    University of Virginia, United States

    2 publications · 198 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. AC
    Andrew C. Wicks

    University of Virginia, United States

    1 publications · 133 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. MI
    Malte Ingo Meyerhuber

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 21

Venues

  1. Business Ethics Quarterly

    BEQ · 6 publications · 3.1K citations

    6

    h-index

  2. Ratio Juris

    2 publications · 71 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. Business & Society

    2 publications · 150 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Harvard Law Review

    1 publications · 1.9K citations

    1

    h-index

  5. 1

    h-index

1–5