Concepedia

Management-induced Yield Variability

Management-Induced Yield Variability is a type of temporal yield variability that arises specifically from deliberate agricultural management decisions and practices, distinguished from environmental or genetic sources by its direct dependence on human-driven inputs such as planting density, fertilizer application, irrigation scheduling, and pest control strategies.

25

Publications

1.1K

Citations

104

Authors

53

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

4

Parents

Publications

25

Management, Topographical, and Weather Effects on Spatial Variability of Crop Grain Yields

Alexandra Kravchenko, G. Philip Robertson, Kurt D. Thelen et al. · Agronomy Journal · 2005 · 146 citations

, , +17

Temporal Yield Variability under Conventional and Alternative Management Systems

Richard G. Smith, Fabián D. Menalled, G. Philip Robertson · Agronomy Journal · 2007 · 132 citations

, , +17

Using precision farming technologies to improve management of soil and fertiliser nitrogen

Alfred M. Blackmer, S. E. White · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · 1997 · 89 citations

, , +17

Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk

S.F. Ledgard, Shelley Falconer, R. Abercrombie et al. · Journal of Dairy Science · 2019 · 72 citations · Full text

, , +15

Risk Perceptions and Management Responses: Producer-Generated Hypotheses For Risk Modeling

George Patrick, Paul N. Wilson, Peter J. Barry et al. · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics · 1985 · 71 citations · Full text

, , +17

1–5 of 25

Authors

104

  1. PA
    Patricia A. O’Rourke

    University of California, Los Angeles, United States

    2 publications · 36 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. PE
    Paul E. Todhunter

    University of North Dakota, United States

    2 publications · 36 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. GP
    G. Philip Robertson

    Michigan State University, United States

    2 publications · 278 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. WH
    Werner H. Terjung

    University of California, Los Angeles, United States

    2 publications · 36 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. JT
    J. T. Hayes

    University of California, Los Angeles, United States

    2 publications · 36 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 104

Institutions

53

  1. Wageningen University & Research

    Wageningen, The Netherlands

    3 h-index

    5 publications

    215 citations

  2. University of California, Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, United States

    3 h-index

    9 publications

    161 citations

  3. Michigan State University

    East Lansing, United States

    2 h-index

    5 publications

    716 citations

  4. Biologie et gestion des champignons phytopathogènes

    Palaiseau, France

    1 h-index

    2 publications

    112 citations

  5. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

    Canberra, Australia

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    12 citations

  6. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario

    Rosario, Argentina

    1 h-index

    3 publications

    108 citations

  7. University of Wisconsin–Madison

    Madison, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    10 citations

  8. University of Arizona

    Tucson, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    71 citations

1–8 of 53

Venues

  1. Agronomy Journal

    3 publications · 319 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. Agricultural Systems

    2 publications · 94 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. Field Crops Research

    3 publications · 85 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. International Journal of Biometeorology

    2 publications · 36 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Economic Botany

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5