Majority Jurisprudence
Majority Jurisprudence is a theoretical framework within political and legal theory that systematically articulates the principles, legitimacy, and institutional mechanisms governing decision-making processes in which the preferences of more than half of a voting or deliberative body prevail over the minority, thereby distinguishing it from alternative normative models of collective choice such as unanimity or consensus-based jurisprudence.
17
Publications
767
Citations
21
Authors
15
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
3
Parents
17
Majority rule and the public provision of a private good
Miguel Gouveia · Public Choice · 1997 · 192 citations
Equality, Democracy, and Constitution: We the People in Court
Ronald Dworkin · Alberta Law Review · 1990 · 93 citations · Full text
1–5 of 17
21
2
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 21
15

University of St.Gallen
Saint Gallen, Switzerland
1 h-index
2 publications
78 citations
University College London
London, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
40 citations
New College
Swindon, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
11 citations
University of Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
1 h-index
1 publications
13 citations
Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah
Jakarta, Indonesia
1 h-index
2 publications
20 citations
University College Dublin
Dublin, Ireland
1 h-index
1 publications
295 citations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
24 citations
Yale University
New Haven, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
15 citations
1–8 of 15
1 publications · 22 citations
1
h-index
SF · 1 publications · 49 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 39 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 11 citations
1
h-index
Repository · 1 publications · 13 citations
1
h-index
1–5