Majority Jurisprudence

Majority Jurisprudence is a theoretical framework within political and legal theory that systematically articulates the principles, legitimacy, and institutional mechanisms governing decision-making processes in which the preferences of more than half of a voting or deliberative body prevail over the minority, thereby distinguishing it from alternative normative models of collective choice such as unanimity or consensus-based jurisprudence.

17

Publications

767

Citations

21

Authors

15

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

3

Authors

21

  1. WK
    Willmoore Kendall

    Yale University, United States

    2 publications · 119 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. RD
    Ronald Dworkin

    New York University, United States

    1 publications · 93 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. SR
    Stephen Robertson

    The University of Sydney, Australia

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. AW
    André Walter

    University of St.Gallen, Switzerland

    1 publications · 39 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. DC
    David Cameron

    Yale University, United States

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 21

Venues

  1. Columbia Law Review

    1 publications · 22 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Social Forces

    SF · 1 publications · 49 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Electoral Studies

    1 publications · 39 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Ratio Juris

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. 1

    h-index

1–5