Majority Judgment

Majority Judgment is a voting method that assigns candidates a collective evaluation by aggregating voters' independent ratings of each candidate and determining the winner based on the highest median rating, distinguishing it from other ranked or scored systems by prioritizing majority acceptance over pairwise comparisons or summed scores.

158

Publications

8.9K

Citations

326

Authors

222

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

26

Authors

326

  1. JI
    José Ignacio Peláez

    Universidad de Málaga, Spain

    3 publications · 90 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. AD
    Andrew D. Martin

    Washington University in St. Louis, United States

    3 publications · 263 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. WD
    William D. Crano

    Claremont Graduate University, United States

    2 publications · 145 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. SB
    Saul Brenner

    University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United States

    2 publications · 64 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. PC
    Peter C. Fishburn

    AT&T (United States), United States

    2 publications · 599 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 326

Venues

  1. American Political Science Review

    5 publications · 217 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    4 publications · 170 citations

    4

    h-index

  3. Social Choice and Welfare

    4 publications · 63 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. European Journal of Social Psychology

    EJSP · 3 publications · 122 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. Public Choice

    3 publications · 42 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5