Judicial Reviewability

Judicial Reviewability is the legal principle whereby judicial bodies possess the authority to examine and assess the constitutionality and legality of actions or decisions made by governmental entities, distinguishing it from other forms of legal scrutiny by specifically targeting the conformity of such actions with higher legal norms, such as constitutions or enabling statutes.

11

Publications

281

Citations

14

Authors

3

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Authors

14

  1. EM
    Edward McWhinney

    University of Toronto, Canada

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. TP
    Tiina Paloniitty

    University of Helsinki, Finland

    1 publications · 35 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. AA
    Achmad Achmad

    Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia

    1 publications · 19 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. SI
    Sirico

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. TP
    Thomas Poole

    London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 29 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 14

Venues

  1. The Yale Law Journal

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Modern Law Review

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. California Law Review

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Columbia Law Review

    1 publications · 74 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum

    1 publications · 19 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5