Judicial Questioning

Judicial Questioning is a formal interaction during oral argument in which a judge poses direct inquiries to an advocate to clarify legal reasoning, test the robustness of arguments, or probe the implications of a position.

44

Publications

2.1K

Citations

76

Authors

52

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

5

Authors

76

  1. MR
    Mark R. Kebbell

    Griffith University, Australia

    4 publications · 163 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. TR
    Timothy R. Johnson

    University of Minnesota, United States

    3 publications · 98 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. SD
    Shane D. Johnson

    University College London, United Kingdom

    3 publications · 114 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. RA
    Richard A. Posner

    University of Chicago, United States

    2 publications · 95 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. KT
    Karen Tracy

    University of Colorado Boulder, United States

    2 publications · 39 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 76

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 4 publications · 110 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. Legal and Criminological Psychology

    3 publications · 80 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Discourse & Society

    3 publications · 116 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. Discourse Studies

    2 publications · 39 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Law and Human Behavior

    2 publications · 180 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5