Judicial Partisanship

Judicial Partisanship is a political bias exhibited by judges or judicial bodies in the interpretation of law or exercise of judicial authority, distinguished from impartial adjudication by alignment with specific ideological, partisan, or political interests that undermines the neutrality expected in judicial tenure.

200

Publications

10.6K

Citations

249

Authors

139

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

38

Authors

249

  1. MS
    Maya Sen

    Harvard University, United States

    10 publications · 571 citations

    10

    h-index

  2. AB
    Adam Bonica

    Stanford University, United States

    8 publications · 336 citations

    8

    h-index

  3. LE
    Lee Epstein

    Washington University in St. Louis, United States

    6 publications · 383 citations

    6

    h-index

  4. LB
    Lawrence Baum

    The Ohio State University, United States

    4 publications · 123 citations

    4

    h-index

  5. KR
    Kyle Rozema

    University of Chicago, United States

    4 publications · 75 citations

    4

    h-index

1–5 of 249

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 20 publications · 824 citations

    14

    h-index

  2. The Journal of Politics

    JP · 11 publications · 1.1K citations

    11

    h-index

  3. Choice Reviews Online

    CRO · 11 publications · 703 citations

    11

    h-index

  4. American Political Science Review

    10 publications · 1.2K citations

    10

    h-index

  5. Political Research Quarterly

    PRQ · 10 publications · 847 citations

    10

    h-index

1–5