Concepedia

Interpretive Default Rules

Interpretive Default Rules is a theoretical construct in contract law that systematically establishes presumptive guidelines for interpreting ambiguous contractual terms based on the parties' prior course of dealing, thereby facilitating consistent and context-sensitive judicial determinations in the absence of explicit agreement.

12

Publications

639

Citations

14

Authors

11

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Parents

Publications

12

Statutory Foreign Affairs Preemption

Jack L. Goldsmith · SSRN Electronic Journal · 2001 · 188 citations · Full text

, , +10

The Sound of Silence: Default Rules and Contractual Consent

Randy E. Barnett · Virginia Law Review · 1992 · 149 citations

, , +13

The Inverted Hierarchy of Contract Interpretation and Supplementation

Eyal Zamir · Columbia Law Review · 1997 · 124 citations · Full text

, , +11

Social Norms and Default Rules Analysis

Lisa Bernstein · 1993 · 42 citations

, , +8

On the logic of defaults

Héctor Geffner · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 1988 · 32 citations

, , +16

1–5 of 12

Authors

14

  1. JW
    Joel Watson

    University of California San Diego, United States

    2 publications · 29 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. AS
    Alan Schwartz

    University of Illinois Chicago, United States

    2 publications · 29 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. JL
    Jack L. Goldsmith

    University of Chicago, United States

    1 publications · 188 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. BA
    Benjamin A. Edsall

    Australian Catholic University, Australia

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. HG
    Héctor Geffner

    Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain

    1 publications · 32 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 14

Institutions

11

  1. University of California San Diego

    San Diego, United States

    2 h-index

    3 publications

    43 citations

  2. Yale University

    New Haven, United States

    2 h-index

    3 publications

    43 citations

  3. Stanford University

    Stanford, United States

    1 h-index

    2 publications

    28 citations

  4. Australian Catholic University

    Brisbane, Australia

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    21 citations

  5. Guizhou Academy of Sciences

    Guiyang, China

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    14 citations

  6. University of Colorado Denver

    Denver, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    13 citations

  7. Southwest University

    Chongqing, China

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    14 citations

  8. Duke University

    Durham, United States

    1 h-index

    2 publications

    28 citations

1–8 of 11

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 2 publications · 203 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

    Conference · 1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Conference · 1 publications · 32 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Columbia Law Review

    1 publications · 124 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. The Journal of Legal Studies

    JLS · 1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5