Interpersonal Utility Comparisons

Interpersonal Utility Comparisons is a theoretical construct in welfare economics and social choice theory that enables the evaluation and aggregation of individual welfare levels across different persons by assigning meaningful numerical representations to subjective utilities, thereby permitting ethical and policy judgments about social welfare based on the relative well-being of individuals.

150

Publications

16.1K

Citations

170

Authors

118

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

18

Variants

Interpersonal Comparisons Of Utility

Authors

170

  1. MF
    Marc Fleurbaey

    Princeton University, United States

    8 publications · 375 citations

    8

    h-index

  2. YN
    Yew‐Kwang Ng

    Monash University, Australia

    8 publications · 700 citations

    8

    h-index

  3. FM
    François Maniquet

    UCLouvain, Belgium

    4 publications · 156 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. KR
    Kevin Roberts

    St. Catherine University, United States

    3 publications · 662 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. KS
    Kotaro Suzumura

    Hitotsubashi University, Japan

    3 publications · 100 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5 of 170

Venues

  1. Economics and Philosophy

    8 publications · 262 citations

    8

    h-index

  2. Econometrica

    7 publications · 1.4K citations

    7

    h-index

  3. Theory and Decision

    7 publications · 290 citations

    7

    h-index

  4. Social Choice and Welfare

    7 publications · 329 citations

    7

    h-index

  5. The Economic Journal

    7 publications · 2.6K citations

    7

    h-index

1–5