Intercultural Argumentation
Intercultural Argumentation is a systematic framework for analyzing and structuring reasoned discourse across distinct cultural contexts, distinguished by its focus on the interplay of cultural norms, values, and communication styles in shaping argumentative strategies and mutual understanding.
46
Publications
4.1K
Citations
77
Authors
56
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
6
Parents
46
Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.
Kaiping Peng, Richard E. Nisbett · American Psychologist · 1999 · 1.7K citations
Hofstede - Culturally questionable?
Michael Jones · Research Online (University of Wollongong) · 2007 · 139 citations · Full text
1–5 of 46
77
4
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 77
56
University of Maryland, College Park
College Park, United States
4 h-index
4 publications
85 citations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Urbana, United States
3 h-index
4 publications
192 citations
Sophia University
Tokyo, Japan
2 h-index
2 publications
56 citations
University of Hartford
West Hartford, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
106 citations

University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Finland
2 h-index
2 publications
99 citations

Urbana University
Urbana, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
140 citations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jerusalem, Israel
2 h-index
2 publications
106 citations

University of Bath
Bath, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
91 citations
1–8 of 56
3 publications · 65 citations
3
h-index
JSLW · 3 publications · 116 citations
3
h-index
2 publications · 76 citations
2
h-index
CCC · 2 publications · 69 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 95 citations
2
h-index
1–5