Concepedia

Inter-process Communication Vulnerabilities

Inter-Process Communication Vulnerabilities is a category of security weaknesses arising from improper implementation or enforcement of communication protocols between co-resident processes on mobile platforms, enabling unauthorized data access, privilege escalation, or code injection through shared system resources.

19

Publications

570

Citations

72

Authors

34

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

7

Variants

Ipc Vulnerabilities

Parents

Publications

19

An empirical study of the robustness of Inter-component Communication in Android

Amiya K. Maji, Fahad A. Arshad, Saurabh Bagchi et al. · 2012 · 95 citations

, , +17

Sealing OS processes to improve dependability and safety

Galen Hunt, Mark Aiken, Manuel Fähndrich et al. · 2007 · 71 citations · Full text

, , +17

Nyx-net

Sergej Schumilo, Cornelius Aschermann, Andrea Jemmett et al. · 2022 · 69 citations · Full text

, , +14

The Misuse of Android Unix Domain Sockets and Security Implications

Yuru Shao, Jason Ott, Yunhan Jia et al. · 2016 · 41 citations · Full text

, , +17

Is layering, harmful? (remote procedure call)

Jon Crowcroft, Ian Wakeman, Z. Wang et al. · IEEE Network · 1992 · 39 citations

, , +14

1–5 of 19

Authors

72

  1. JR
    James R. Larus

    University of Wisconsin–Madison, United States

    2 publications · 89 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. MF
    Manuel Fähndrich

    Microsoft (United States), United States

    2 publications · 89 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. TW
    Ted Wobber

    Microsoft (United States), United States

    2 publications · 89 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. DT
    David Tarditi

    Microsoft (United States), United States

    2 publications · 89 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. MA
    Mark Aiken

    Microsoft (United States), United States

    2 publications · 89 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 72

Institutions

34

  1. Microsoft (United States)

    Redmond, United States

    2 h-index

    20 publications

    890 citations

  2. University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, United States

    2 h-index

    5 publications

    157 citations

  3. Helmholtz Center for Information Security

    Saarbrücken, Germany

    2 h-index

    4 publications

    117 citations

  4. University of California, Riverside

    Riverside, United States

    2 h-index

    3 publications

    97 citations

  5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

    Beijing, China

    2 h-index

    5 publications

    52 citations

  6. Renmin University of China

    Beijing, China

    1 h-index

    3 publications

    36 citations

  7. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

    Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    69 citations

  8. Chinese Academy of Sciences

    Beijing, China

    1 h-index

    3 publications

    36 citations

1–8 of 34

Venues

  1. IEEE Network

    1 publications · 39 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Empirical Software Engineering

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Database

    1 publications · 29 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review

    1 publications · 18 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Computing

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5