Indispensability Arguments

Indispensability Arguments is a class of philosophical argument in the philosophy of mathematics that aims to justify commitment to the truth or existence of certain entities or claims by contending that they are indispensable to our best scientific theories or explanatory practices.

36

Publications

2.4K

Citations

36

Authors

26

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

3

Authors

36

  1. JS
    Juha Saatsi

    University of Leeds, United Kingdom

    3 publications · 200 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. CP
    Christopher Pincock

    Purdue University West Lafayette, United States

    2 publications · 179 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. AR
    Alan R. H. Baker

    Swarthmore College, United States

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. RM
    Russell Marcus

    Hamilton College, United States

    2 publications · 32 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. PG
    Pieranna Garavaso

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 36

Venues

  1. Philosophia Mathematica

    6 publications · 199 citations

    6

    h-index

  2. Synthese

    3 publications · 52 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. The Philosophical Quarterly

    2 publications · 95 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Philosophical Studies

    2 publications · 108 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Erkenntnis

    2 publications · 66 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5