Hybrid Rulemaking

Hybrid Rulemaking is a formal administrative process that belongs to the broader category of rulemaking procedures, distinguished by its incorporation of elements from both informal notice-and-comment rulemaking and formal adjudicatory hearings, often requiring additional procedural safeguards such as evidentiary hearings or detailed record development.

4

Publications

135

Citations

6

Authors

2

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Authors

6

  1. JS
    Jianyong Shi

    Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

    1 publications · 97 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. SF
    Stephen F. Williams

    Auburn University, United States

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. EM
    Elizabeth M. Bruch

    Valparaiso University, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. DR
    David Richards

    University of Sheffield, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. CW
    Chaoyu Wang

    Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China

    1 publications · 97 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 6

Institutions

2

  1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University

    Shanghai, China

    1 h-index

    3 publications

    291 citations

  2. Valparaiso University

    Valparaiso, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    11 citations

1–2 of 2

Venues

  1. The University of Chicago Law Review

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)

    Repository · 1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Advanced Engineering Informatics

    1 publications · 97 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. 1

    h-index

1–4