Grounding Objection

The Grounding Objection is a philosophical argument challenging the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human free will by asserting that future-tensed truth claims about free actions lack a metaphysical grounding in the present, thereby undermining the coherence of God's presently existing true beliefs about future contingent events.

8

Publications

439

Citations

8

Authors

7

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Variants

The Grounding Objection

Authors

8

  1. RI
    Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson

    Lund University, Sweden

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. NA
    Neal A. Tognazzini

    William & Mary, United States

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. JH
    Joachim Horvath

    University of Cologne, Germany

    1 publications · 109 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. JA
    Jamin Asay

    University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR China

    1 publications · 22 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. TM
    Thomas M. Crisp

    Georgetown University, United States

    1 publications · 168 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 8

Venues

  1. Faith and Philosophy

    2 publications · 73 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Noûs

    1 publications · 168 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Philosophical Psychology

    1 publications · 109 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Manuscrito

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Australasian Journal of Philosophy

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5