Concepedia

Evaluation Of Text Generation

Evaluation of Text Generation is a scholarly methodological framework that systematizes the assessment of generated textual outputs by establishing criteria, metrics, and benchmarks to determine fidelity, coherence, relevance, and quality relative to human language expectations.

551

Publications

37.6K

Citations

1.8K

Authors

517

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

395

Parents

Publications

551

BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT

Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2019 · 2K citations · Full text

, , +15

The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration

Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2019 · 1.1K citations · Full text

, , +16

Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluation

Albert Gatt, Emiel Krahmer · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · 2018 · 758 citations · Full text

, , +11

From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing

Ismail Dergaa, Karim Chamari, Piotr Żmijewski et al. · Biology of Sport · 2023 · 741 citations · Full text

, , +16

Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers

Catherine A. Gao, Frederick M. Howard, Nikolay S. Markov et al. · npj Digital Medicine · 2023 · 657 citations · Full text

, , +15

1–5 of 551

Authors

1.8K

  1. AB
    Anja Belz

    University of Brighton, United Kingdom

    13 publications · 902 citations

    12

    h-index

  2. NA
    Noah A. Smith

    Carnegie Mellon University, United States

    11 publications · 572 citations

    11

    h-index

  3. YC
    Yejin Choi

    University of Washington, United States

    12 publications · 2.2K citations

    11

    h-index

  4. AG
    Albert Gatt

    University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom

    11 publications · 1.6K citations

    10

    h-index

  5. EK
    Emiel Krahmer

    Tilburg University, Netherlands

    10 publications · 1.5K citations

    10

    h-index

1–5 of 1.8K

Institutions

517

  1. University of Edinburgh

    Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    21 h-index

    59 publications

    4.2K citations

  2. Carnegie Mellon University

    Pittsburgh, United States

    18 h-index

    84 publications

    3.3K citations

  3. University of Aberdeen

    Aberdeen, United Kingdom

    17 h-index

    39 publications

    2.3K citations

  4. University of Washington

    Seattle, United States

    17 h-index

    46 publications

    8.8K citations

  5. Google (United States)

    Mountain View, United States

    17 h-index

    101 publications

    5.1K citations

  6. University of Brighton

    Brighton, United Kingdom

    15 h-index

    23 publications

    1.4K citations

  7. Microsoft (United States)

    Redmond, United States

    15 h-index

    50 publications

    6.3K citations

  8. Stanford University

    Stanford, United States

    15 h-index

    50 publications

    6K citations

1–8 of 517

Venues

  1. arXiv (Cornell University)

    Repository · 97 publications · 8.1K citations

    36

    h-index

  2. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Conference · 9 publications · 449 citations

    9

    h-index

  3. Computational Linguistics

    9 publications · 856 citations

    9

    h-index

  4. 9

    h-index

  5. Natural Language Engineering

    6 publications · 724 citations

    6

    h-index

1–5