Ethical Paradox

An "Ethical Paradox" is a theoretical construct in moral philosophy that denotes a situation in which two or more ethical principles or obligations conflict in such a way that adhering to one necessarily requires violating the other, thereby challenging coherent decision-making within normative frameworks.

54

Publications

3K

Citations

81

Authors

45

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

13

Variants

Moral Paradox

Authors

81

  1. SS
    Saul Smilansky

    University of Haifa, Israel

    1 publications · 34 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. DC
    Dirk C. Moosmayer

    University of Nottingham Ningbo China, China

    1 publications · 68 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. NS
    Nils-Hennes Stear

    University of Southampton, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. TS
    Thomas Schaefer

    Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Germany

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. TA
    Tanja Aitamurto

    Stanford University, United States

    1 publications · 78 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 81

Venues

  1. Journal of Business Ethics

    5 publications · 195 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. Academy of Management Review

    AMR · 2 publications · 158 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. The Philosophical Quarterly

    2 publications · 46 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. AI and Ethics

    1 publications · 45 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Journal of Medical Ethics

    2 publications · 114 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5