Equal Protection Arguments

Equal Protection Arguments is a legal and constitutional reasoning framework that belongs to the class of civil rights justification models, distinguished by its reliance on the principle that laws must treat individuals in similar circumstances equally, particularly by challenging discriminatory classifications on the basis of sexual orientation in the context of marriage rights.

201

Publications

7.2K

Citations

230

Authors

118

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

23

Authors

230

  1. RS
    Reva Siegel

    Yale University, United States

    6 publications · 399 citations

    6

    h-index

  2. AK
    Andrew Koppelman

    Northwestern University, United States

    3 publications · 55 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. AJ
    Adam Jowett

    Coventry University, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 59 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. HJ
    Howard Jay Graham

    Los Angeles Public Library, United States

    2 publications · 45 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. DL
    David L. Kirp

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    2 publications · 73 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 230

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 19 publications · 451 citations

    13

    h-index

  2. Choice Reviews Online

    CRO · 12 publications · 670 citations

    12

    h-index

  3. eYLS (Yale Law School)

    Repository · 9 publications · 176 citations

    9

    h-index

  4. Michigan Law Review

    8 publications · 352 citations

    8

    h-index

  5. Stanford Law Review

    6 publications · 766 citations

    6

    h-index

1–5