Ending Ambiguity

Ending Ambiguity is a narrative phenomenon in literary theory whereby a text's conclusion resists definitive interpretation, distinguishing itself from resolved or closed endings by deliberately withholding or complicating closure through indeterminate outcomes, unresolved plotlines, or conflicting thematic signals.

10

Publications

388

Citations

10

Authors

3

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

10

  1. DG
    Donald G. MacKay

    University of California, Los Angeles, United States

    2 publications · 134 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. DG
    Daniel Gile

    Université Lumière Lyon 2, France

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. JH
    J. Hillis Miller

    University of California, Irvine, United States

    1 publications · 28 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. JH
    J. Hillis Miller

    Johns Hopkins University, United States

    1 publications · 19 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. DJ
    David Janzen

    Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Canada

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 10

Institutions

3

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Cambridge, United States

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    134 citations

  2. North Central College

    Naperville, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    10 citations

  3. Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language

    Donostia / San Sebastian, Spain

    1 h-index

    2 publications

    86 citations

1–3 of 3

Venues

  1. Perception & Psychophysics

    2 publications · 134 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Brain Research

    1 publications · 43 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Nineteenth-Century Fiction

    1 publications · 19 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. OpenstarTs (Univeristy of Trieste https://www.units.it/)

    Repository · 1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament

    JSOT · 1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5