Due Process Arguments

Due Process Arguments is a legal and constitutional reasoning framework that belongs to the genus of constitutional arguments and is differentiated by its reliance on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to assert that marriage equality is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of individuals, thereby prohibiting states from depriving same-sex couples of the right to marry without compelling justification.

57

Publications

1.7K

Citations

70

Authors

38

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

5

Authors

70

  1. HJ
    Howard Jay Graham

    Los Angeles Public Library, United States

    2 publications · 41 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. GL
    Gary LaFree

    University of Maryland, College Park, United States

    2 publications · 100 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. SK
    Susanne Karstedt

    Griffith University, Australia

    2 publications · 100 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. DJ
    David J. Houston

    University of Tennessee at Knoxville, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. SS
    Stephen Stagner

    1 publications · 12 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 70

Venues

  1. Harvard Law Review

    5 publications · 72 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. Michigan Law Review

    3 publications · 82 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Duke Law Journal

    2 publications · 28 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Law and Human Behavior

    2 publications · 52 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. The Yale Law Journal

    2 publications · 77 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5