Due Process Arguments
Due Process Arguments is a legal and constitutional reasoning framework that belongs to the genus of constitutional arguments and is differentiated by its reliance on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to assert that marriage equality is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of individuals, thereby prohibiting states from depriving same-sex couples of the right to marry without compelling justification.
57
Publications
1.7K
Citations
70
Authors
38
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
5
Parents
57
Cass R. Sunstein · SSRN Electronic Journal · 2007 · 89 citations · Full text
Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law +15
1–5 of 57
70
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1
h-index
1 publications · 12 citations
1
h-index
1–5 of 70
38

University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
37 citations
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
70 citations

Keele University
Newcastle-under-Lyme, United Kingdom
2 h-index
2 publications
100 citations
Yale University
New Haven, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
22 citations
Florida Atlantic University
Boca Raton, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
11 citations
University of Maryland, College Park
College Park, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
44 citations
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
New York, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
66 citations
Ottawa University
Ottawa, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
61 citations
1–8 of 38
5 publications · 72 citations
5
h-index
3 publications · 82 citations
3
h-index
2 publications · 28 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 52 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 77 citations
2
h-index
1–5