Double-blind Review

Double-Blind Review is a form of academic peer review in which both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other, thereby minimizing potential bias in the evaluation process.

212

Publications

12.7K

Citations

614

Authors

328

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

42

Variants

Double-blind Peer Review

Authors

614

  1. MR
    Martyn Rittman

    Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (Switzerland), Switzerland

    3 publications · 77 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. EA
    Emilie Aimé

    British Ecological Society, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 115 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. TT
    Tom Tregenza

    University of Exeter, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 585 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. TB
    Terje Brasethvik

    Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

    2 publications · 195 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. AB
    Alberto Bacchelli

    Delft University of Technology, Netherlands

    2 publications · 76 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 614

Venues

  1. PubMed

    Repository · 14 publications · 748 citations

    13

    h-index

  2. JAMA

    11 publications · 1.7K citations

    11

    h-index

  3. Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases

    11 publications · 368 citations

    10

    h-index

  4. 5

    h-index

  5. Sicherheit & Frieden

    4 publications · 90 citations

    4

    h-index

1–5