Discretion Debate
The "Discretion Debate" is a theoretical framework in macroeconomic stabilization that contrasts the effectiveness of discretionary policy interventions with rule-based policy approaches by evaluating the trade-offs between flexibility in responding to economic shocks and the risks of time inconsistency, political influence, and reduced policy credibility.
14
Publications
430
Citations
12
Authors
9
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
3
Variants
Rules Versus Discretion DebateRules Vs Discretion Debate
Parents
14
1–5 of 14
12
3
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 12
9
University of Missouri–Kansas City
Kansas City, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
119 citations

National Bureau of Economic Research
Cambridge, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
72 citations
Princeton University
Princeton, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
26 citations

Hoover Institution
Stanford, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
29 citations

University of Bristol
Bristol, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
15 citations
Stanford University
Stanford, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
29 citations
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Richmond, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
31 citations
Levy Economics Institute of Bard College
New York, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
33 citations
1–8 of 9
Repository · 2 publications · 25 citations
2
h-index
Repository · 2 publications · 64 citations
2
h-index
Repository · 2 publications · 55 citations
2
h-index
1 publications · 17 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 70 citations
1
h-index
1–5