Discretion Debate

The "Discretion Debate" is a theoretical framework in macroeconomic stabilization that contrasts the effectiveness of discretionary policy interventions with rule-based policy approaches by evaluating the trade-offs between flexibility in responding to economic shocks and the risks of time inconsistency, political influence, and reduced policy credibility.

14

Publications

430

Citations

12

Authors

9

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

3

Variants

Rules Versus Discretion DebateRules Vs Discretion Debate

Authors

12

  1. LR
    L. Randall Wray

    University of Missouri–Kansas City, United States

    3 publications · 119 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. AS
    Alan S. Blinder

    Princeton University, United States

    2 publications · 83 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. RL
    Robert L. Hetzel

    Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, United States

    2 publications · 49 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. FS
    Frederic S. Mishkin

    National Bureau of Economic Research, United States

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. DB
    David Bull

    ARM (United Kingdom), United Kingdom

    1 publications · 15 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 12

Venues

  1. Econstor (Econstor)

    Repository · 2 publications · 25 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 2 publications · 64 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. National Bureau of Economic Research

    Repository · 2 publications · 55 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. International Finance

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Law and History Review

    1 publications · 70 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5