Deliberative Judgment
Deliberative Judgment is a theoretical framework within adjudication theory that systematically integrates reasoned discourse, recursive evaluation, and normative reasoning to distinguish judicial or epistemic decision-making processes from mere aggregative or intuitive judgments.
81
Publications
6.2K
Citations
172
Authors
124
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
23
Parents
81
Nishi Shah, J. David Velleman · The Philosophical Review · 2005 · 662 citations · Full text
Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes
Cass R. Sunstein · The Yale Law Journal · 2000 · 373 citations
Ellen Peters, Thomas M. Hess, Daniel Västfjäll et al. · Perspectives on Psychological Science · 2007 · 365 citations
Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Andrew J. Wistrich · eYLS (Yale Law School) · 2007 · 312 citations · Full text
Law, Behavioral Sciences, Psychology +15
1–5 of 81
172
3
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 172
124
University of Washington
Seattle, United States
5 h-index
6 publications
298 citations

University of Leeds
Leeds, United Kingdom
3 h-index
6 publications
394 citations
The Ohio State University
Columbus, United States
3 h-index
4 publications
74 citations
University of Missouri
Columbia, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
62 citations
Columbia University
New York, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
974 citations
New York University
New York, United States
2 h-index
3 publications
208 citations

University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 h-index
6 publications
270 citations
Heidelberg University
Heidelberg, Germany
2 h-index
3 publications
144 citations
1–8 of 124
3 publications · 71 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 237 citations
3
h-index
Repository · 3 publications · 105 citations
3
h-index
Repository · 2 publications · 412 citations
2
h-index
CRO · 2 publications · 348 citations
2
h-index
1–5