Defeasible Argumentation

Defeasible Argumentation is a type of argumentation framework in which conclusions are drawn provisionally and may be retracted or revised in light of new evidence or counterarguments, distinguishing it from monotonic logical systems by allowing for defeasible inference.

272

Publications

13.3K

Citations

316

Authors

177

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

53

Authors

316

  1. GR
    Guillermo Ricardo Simari

    Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina

    25 publications · 2.1K citations

    17

    h-index

  2. HP
    Henry Prakken

    Utrecht University, Netherlands

    19 publications · 2.1K citations

    16

    h-index

  3. GG
    Guido Governatori

    Data61, Australia

    15 publications · 796 citations

    14

    h-index

  4. AJ
    Alejandro Javier García

    Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina

    14 publications · 1.2K citations

    13

    h-index

  5. CI
    Carlos Iván Chesñevar

    Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina

    12 publications · 391 citations

    11

    h-index

1–5 of 316

Venues

  1. Journal of Logic and Computation

    13 publications · 645 citations

    12

    h-index

  2. Argument & Computation

    9 publications · 1.3K citations

    9

    h-index

  3. Informal Logic

    9 publications · 324 citations

    9

    h-index

  4. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

    Repository · 7 publications · 211 citations

    7

    h-index

  5. Artificial Intelligence

    7 publications · 1.1K citations

    7

    h-index

1–5