Concepedia

Dating Discrepancy Analysis

Dating Discrepancy Analysis is a methodological framework used in prenatal care research to systematically assess and interpret differences between gestational age estimates derived from various clinical and ultrasonographic dating criteria.

7

Publications

232

Citations

27

Authors

11

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Parents

Publications

7

Evaluation of ultrasound‐estimated date of delivery in 17 450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?

Tri Huu Nguyen, Torben Larsen, Gerda Engholm et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 1999 · 72 citations · Full text

, , +16

Maternal obesity is a potential source of error in mid‐trimester ultrasound estimation of gestational age

Marija Simić, I. A. Wåhlin, K. Maršál et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2009 · 43 citations · Full text

, , +17

Maternal and fetal characteristics affect discrepancies between pregnancy‐dating methods: a population‐based cross‐sectional register study

Merit Kullinger, Jan Wesström, Helle Kieler et al. · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · 2016 · 29 citations · Full text

, , +17

Prenatal ultrasound findings in affected and unaffected pregnancies that are screen-positive for trisomy 18: the California experience

Lisa Feuchtbaum, Robert J. Currier, Fred Lorey et al. · Prenatal Diagnosis · 2000 · 26 citations

, , +13

Determination of gestational age in twin pregnancy: Which fetal crown–rump length should be used?

Kanika Chaudhuri, Linlin Su, Peng‐Cheang Wong et al. · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2012 · 24 citations

, , +17

1–5 of 7

Authors

27

  1. HK
    Helle Kieler

    Karolinska Institutet, Sweden

    2 publications · 43 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. AS
    Alkistis Skalkidou

    Uppsala University, Sweden

    2 publications · 43 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. MK
    Merit Kullinger

    Uppsala University, Sweden

    2 publications · 43 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. GC
    George C. Cunningham

    California Health and Human Services Agency, United States

    1 publications · 26 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. KC
    Kanika Chaudhuri

    National University of Singapore, Singapore

    1 publications · 24 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 27

Institutions

11

  1. Karolinska Institutet

    Stockholm, Sweden

    3 h-index

    5 publications

    143 citations

  2. Uppsala University

    Uppsala, Sweden

    2 h-index

    5 publications

    115 citations

  3. Danish National Research Foundation

    Copenhagen, Denmark

    1 h-index

    2 publications

    144 citations

  4. Uppsala University Hospital

    Uppsala, Sweden

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    14 citations

  5. National University Hospital

    Singapore, Singapore

    1 h-index

    5 publications

    120 citations

  6. Lund University

    Lund, Sweden

    1 h-index

    3 publications

    129 citations

  7. Herlev Hospital

    Herlev, Denmark

    1 h-index

    2 publications

    144 citations

  8. National University of Singapore

    Singapore, Singapore

    1 h-index

    6 publications

    144 citations

1–8 of 11

Venues

  1. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

    2 publications · 115 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Scientific Reports

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Prenatal Diagnosis

    1 publications · 26 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    1 publications · 29 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. 1

    h-index

1–5