Cross-examination Ethics

Cross-Examination Ethics is a specialized ethical framework within court interpreting ethics that governs the interpreter’s conduct during adversarial questioning, ensuring linguistic accuracy, impartiality, and fidelity to the original discourse while resisting manipulation or distortion under pressured examination conditions.

7

Publications

176

Citations

15

Authors

9

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

15

  1. LN
    Lorri N. Williams

    Williams College, United States

    1 publications · 37 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. BA
    Bridget A. Larson

    University of Alabama, United States

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. HP
    Hyun-Joo Park

    Pusan National University, South Korea

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. IJ
    Insun Jang

    Korean Bible University, South Korea

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. SL
    Stanley L. Brodsky

    University of Alabama, United States

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 15

Venues

  1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Journal of Politeness Research

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Psychiatry Psychology and Law

    1 publications · 41 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. 1

    h-index

  5. Law and Human Behavior

    1 publications · 37 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5