Cross-examination Discourse

Cross-Examination Discourse is a distinct form of legal discourse characterized by a structured, adversarial questioning technique employed during judicial proceedings to challenge the credibility, consistency, and reliability of a witness's testimony through targeted, often leading, questions.

30

Publications

1.3K

Citations

57

Authors

32

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

7

Authors

57

  1. DA
    Dawn Archer

    University of Lancashire, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 67 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. SH
    Sandra Hale

    UNSW Sydney, Australia

    2 publications · 183 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. DE
    Diana Eades

    University of New England, Australia

    2 publications · 172 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. RZ
    Rachel Zajac

    University of Otago, New Zealand

    1 publications · 49 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. JS
    Jack Sidnell

    University of Toronto, Canada

    1 publications · 67 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 57

Venues

  1. Language in Society

    3 publications · 344 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. 3

    h-index

  3. PubMed

    Repository · 1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Man

    1 publications · 19 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5