Cross-examination Discourse
Cross-Examination Discourse is a distinct form of legal discourse characterized by a structured, adversarial questioning technique employed during judicial proceedings to challenge the credibility, consistency, and reliability of a witness's testimony through targeted, often leading, questions.
30
Publications
1.3K
Citations
57
Authors
32
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
7
Parents
30
When lawyers question children: Is justice served?
Nancy W. Perry, Bradley D. McAuliff, Paulette Tam et al. · Law and Human Behavior · 1995 · 130 citations
1–5 of 30
57
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 57
32

University of Lancashire
Preston, United Kingdom
2 h-index
2 publications
67 citations
Auckland University of Technology
Auckland, New Zealand
2 h-index
4 publications
140 citations
Harvard University
Cambridge, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
10 citations
Dalian University of Technology
Dalian, China
1 h-index
1 publications
20 citations

Texas Health Dallas
Dallas, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
13 citations
Guangdong Pharmaceutical University
Guangzhou, China
1 h-index
1 publications
19 citations
Google DeepMind (United Kingdom)
London, United Kingdom
1 h-index
1 publications
41 citations

Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv, Israel
1 h-index
3 publications
123 citations
1–8 of 32
3 publications · 344 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 176 citations
3
h-index
Repository · 1 publications · 10 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 13 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 19 citations
1
h-index
1–5