Critical Statutory Interpretation

Critical Statutory Interpretation is a methodological approach within legal hermeneutics that systematically interrogates the ideological, social, and power-laden dimensions underlying statutory texts and their interpretation, distinguishing itself from traditional interpretive methods by emphasizing the role of context, critique, and the deconstruction of legal neutrality.

4

Publications

69

Citations

5

Authors

3

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

0

Authors

5

  1. PM
    Paul M. Schwartz

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. YK
    Yule Kim

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. MT
    Mark Tushnet

    Georgetown University, United States

    1 publications · 22 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. RM
    Richard M. Hynes

    University of Virginia, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. JD
    John Duffy

    University of Pittsburgh, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 5

Institutions

3

  1. Georgetown University

    Washington, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    22 citations

  2. University of California, Berkeley

    Berkeley, United States

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    16 citations

  3. University of Virginia

    Charlottesville, United States

    1 h-index

    2 publications

    22 citations

1–3 of 3

Venues

  1. Journal of Political Philosophy

    1 publications · 22 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. 1

    h-index

  3. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

1–3