Concepedia

Cranfield Paradigm

The Cranfield Paradigm is a formal evaluation framework in information retrieval that belongs to the class of experimental methodologies and is distinguished by its reliance on curated test collections comprising standardized document sets, query topics, and relevance judgments to assess retrieval system performance objectively.

81

Publications

5.2K

Citations

177

Authors

80

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

14

Variants

Cranfield Methodology

Parents

Publications

81

Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information

Chris Buckley, Ellen M. Voorhees · 2004 · 738 citations

, , +13

The CRANFIELD TESTS ON INDEX LANGUAGE DEVICES

Cyril W. Cleverdon · Aslib Proceedings · 1967 · 478 citations

, , +6

USING PROBABILISTIC MODELS OF DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL WITHOUT RELEVANCE INFORMATION

W. Bruce Croft, David J. Harper · Journal of Documentation · 1979 · 436 citations

, , +14

Relevance feedback revisited

Donna Harman · 1992 · 407 citations · Full text

, , +16

The significance of the Cranfield tests on index languages

Cyril W. Cleverdon · 1991 · 182 citations · Full text

, , +6

1–5 of 81

Authors

177

  1. CW
    Cyril W. Cleverdon

    Cranfield University, United Kingdom

    7 publications · 1.1K citations

    7

    h-index

  2. MD
    Mark D. Smucker

    University of Waterloo, Canada

    5 publications · 196 citations

    5

    h-index

  3. CZ
    ChengXiang Zhai

    University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, United States

    4 publications · 157 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. JL
    Jimmy Lin

    University of Waterloo, Canada

    4 publications · 122 citations

    4

    h-index

  5. KB
    Krisztian Balog

    University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

    3 publications · 83 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5 of 177

Institutions

80

  1. Cranfield University

    Cranfield, United Kingdom

    7 h-index

    10 publications

    462 citations

  2. University of Waterloo

    Waterloo, Canada

    7 h-index

    11 publications

    424 citations

  3. Microsoft (United States)

    Redmond, United States

    6 h-index

    7 publications

    238 citations

  4. University of Sheffield

    Sheffield, United Kingdom

    6 h-index

    13 publications

    756 citations

  5. National Institute of Standards and Technology

    Gaithersburg, United States

    5 h-index

    5 publications

    1.3K citations

  6. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

    Urbana, United States

    4 h-index

    6 publications

    223 citations

  7. University College London

    London, United Kingdom

    3 h-index

    4 publications

    132 citations

  8. Microsoft Research (United Kingdom)

    Cambridge, United Kingdom

    3 h-index

    3 publications

    151 citations

1–8 of 80

Venues

  1. ACM SIGIR Forum

    5 publications · 195 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. Journal of Documentation

    5 publications · 682 citations

    5

    h-index

  3. CERES (Cranfield University)

    Repository · 3 publications · 252 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. Information Processing & Management

    3 publications · 137 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. Aslib Proceedings

    2 publications · 537 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5