Concepedia

Crab Algorithm

The CRAB Algorithm is a quantum optimal control method that belongs to the class of gradient-free optimization algorithms, distinguished by its use of truncated basis functions and iterative search strategies to efficiently shape control pulses for high-dimensional quantum systems.

8

Publications

679

Citations

37

Authors

11

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

5

Variants

Chopped Random Basis Algorithm

Parents

Publications

8

Chopped random-basis quantum optimization

Tommaso Caneva, Tommaso Calarco, Simone Montangero · Physical Review A · 2011 · 400 citations · Full text

, , +10

Characterizing isolated attosecond pulses from hollow-core waveguides using multi-cycle driving pulses

Isabell Thomann, Alon Bahabad, X. Liu et al. · Optics Express · 2009 · 82 citations · Full text

, , +14

Quantum optimal control in a chopped basis: Applications in control of Bose-Einstein condensates

Jens Jakob Sørensen, Mikel Aranburu, T. Heinzel et al. · Physical review. A/Physical review, A · 2018 · 80 citations · Full text

, , +15

Enhancement of deep-sea floor images obtained by an underwater vehicle and its evaluation by crab recognition

Jonghyun Ahn, Shinsuke Yasukawa, Takashi Sonoda et al. · Journal of Marine Science and Technology · 2017 · 45 citations

, , +16

Development of an Algorithm to Distinguish Smoldering Versus Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma in Claims-Based Data Sets

Mark A. Fiala, James Dukeman, Sascha A. Tuchman et al. · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · 2017 · 27 citations · Full text

, , +17

1–5 of 8

Authors

37

  1. MA
    Mark A. Fiala

    Washington University in St. Louis, United States

    1 publications · 27 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. YD
    Yi Di

    Hubei University Of Economics, China

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. TU
    Tamaki Ura

    The University of Tokyo, Japan

    1 publications · 45 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. MM
    Margaret M. Murnane

    Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, United States

    1 publications · 82 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. ZD
    Zegang Ding

    Beijing Institute of Technology, China

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 37

Institutions

11

  1. China State Construction Engineering (China)

    Beijing, China

    1 h-index

    1 publications

    21 citations

  2. University of Oregon

    Eugene, United States

    1 h-index

    3 publications

    42 citations

  3. Kyushu Institute of Technology

    Kitakyushu, Japan

    1 h-index

    5 publications

    225 citations

  4. Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics

    Boulder, United States

    1 h-index

    4 publications

    328 citations

  5. Ajman University

    Ajman, United Arab Emirates

    1 h-index

    6 publications

    162 citations

  6. Universität Ulm

    Ulm, Germany

    1 h-index

    3 publications

    1.2K citations

  7. Aarhus University

    Aarhus, Denmark

    1 h-index

    4 publications

    320 citations

  8. Georgia Institute of Technology

    Atlanta, United States

    1 h-index

    2 publications

    164 citations

1–8 of 11

Venues

  1. Physical review. A/Physical review, A

    PRA · 2 publications · 94 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics

    1 publications · 27 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Physical Review A

    PRA · 1 publications · 400 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Journal of Marine Science and Technology

    1 publications · 45 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Synthetic Aperture Radar (EUSAR), 2010 8th European Conference on

    Conference · 1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5