Consequence Argument
The "Consequence Argument" is a philosophical argument in the free will debate that belongs to the class of logical arguments aiming to demonstrate the incompatibility of determinism and moral responsibility, distinguished by its claim that because agents cannot change the past or the laws of nature, and present actions are logical consequences of these, they cannot be free in a way that allows for alternative possibilities.
81
Publications
3K
Citations
107
Authors
75
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
15
Parents
81
The Anthropology of Justice: Law as Culture in Islamic Society.
Sally Falk Moore, Lawrence Rosen · Man · 1990 · 351 citations
Compatibilism and the consequence argument
Terence Horgan · Philosophical Studies · 1985 · 116 citations
Timothy Williamson · Ratio · 2000 · 99 citations
1–5 of 81
107
London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom
2 publications · 59 citations
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 107
75
London School of Economics and Political Science
London, United Kingdom
3 h-index
3 publications
73 citations
Florida State University
Tallahassee, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
111 citations
Columbia University
New York, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
29 citations
University of Arizona
Tucson, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
30 citations

Washington State University
Pullman, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
71 citations

University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
2 h-index
2 publications
141 citations
Florida A&M University - Florida State University College of Engineering
Tallahassee, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
82 citations

Northern Illinois University
DeKalb, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
25 citations
1–8 of 75
7 publications · 228 citations
7
h-index
3 publications · 125 citations
3
h-index
CJP · 3 publications · 103 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 160 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 101 citations
3
h-index
1–5