Confirmation Reforms

Confirmation Reforms is a scholarly framework within the domain of political institutional analysis that systematically proposes modifications to the procedures, criteria, or institutional actors involved in the confirmation of executive or judicial appointments, distinguishing itself by focusing on enhancing transparency, efficiency, and accountability in vetting processes.

2

Publications

34

Citations

5

Authors

5

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

2

Authors

5

  1. CC
    Christine C. Bird

    University at Albany, State University of New York, United States

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. MB
    Matt Barno

    University of California, Irvine, United States

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. ML
    Mona Lynch

    University of California, Irvine, United States

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. MO
    Marisa Omori

    University of Miami, United States

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. ZA
    Zachary A. McGee

    The University of Texas at Austin, United States

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 5

Venues

  1. American Politics Research

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Criminology

    1 publications · 20 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. The Forum

    1 publications · 11 citations

1–3