Comparative Punishment Analysis

Comparative Punishment Analysis is a methodological framework within Eighth Amendment interpretation that systematically evaluates the severity and proportionality of criminal penalties by comparing analogous punishments across jurisdictions, historical periods, or legal systems to determine constitutional compliance with evolving standards of decency.

13

Publications

516

Citations

15

Authors

13

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

2

Authors

15

  1. JB
    Jean‐Paul Brodeur

    Université de Montréal, Canada

    1 publications · 37 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. JQ
    James Q. Whitman

    Yale University, United States

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. DC
    David C. May

    Mississippi State University, United States

    1 publications · 13 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. AJ
    Adam J. Kolber

    Brooklyn Law School, United States

    1 publications · 50 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. NL
    Nicola Lacey

    London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 24 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 15

Venues

  1. Punishment & Society

    1 publications · 70 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. Crime and Justice

    CRIMEJ · 1 publications · 37 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Crime Law and Social Change

    1 publications · 59 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. The British Journal of Criminology

    1 publications · 10 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5