Comparative Outcomes Modeling
Comparative Outcomes Modeling is a methodological framework within health services research that belongs to the class of comparative effectiveness models and is distinguished by its focus on quantitatively simulating and contrasting clinical, economic, or patient-centered outcomes across alternative interventions using empirical data and statistical or mathematical techniques.
68
Publications
9.5K
Citations
453
Authors
274
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
23
68
The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP
Shukri F. Khuri, Jennifer Daley, William G. Henderson et al. · Annals of Surgery · 1998 · 1.5K citations · Full text
1–5 of 68
453
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
3 publications · 62 citations
3
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 453
274

Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, United States
5 h-index
10 publications
5K citations
Stanford University
Stanford, United States
5 h-index
19 publications
1.2K citations
Harvard University
Cambridge, United States
5 h-index
9 publications
312 citations
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, United States
4 h-index
6 publications
431 citations
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, United States
4 h-index
9 publications
8.1K citations

University of York
York, United Kingdom
4 h-index
7 publications
215 citations
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, United States
4 h-index
5 publications
6.1K citations
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
3.1K citations
1–8 of 274
3 publications · 656 citations
3
h-index
HSR · 3 publications · 213 citations
3
h-index
Repository · 2 publications · 50 citations
2
h-index
NEJM · 2 publications · 3.2K citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 218 citations
2
h-index
1–5