Comparative Judicial Methodology
Comparative Judicial Methodology is a systematic approach within legal scholarship that belongs to the genus of comparative legal methods and is distinguished by its focused analysis of judicial reasoning, interpretive techniques, and adjudicative practices across different legal systems to identify functional equivalences, differences, and potential harmonizations in the application of foreign law by domestic courts.
66
Publications
3.7K
Citations
80
Authors
51
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
8
Parents
66
Justice and Judgement among the Tiv
C. A. Ackah, Paul Bohannan · British Journal of Sociology · 1958 · 257 citations
Law, Comparative Law, Jurisprudence +14
The judicial process in comparative perspective
Choice Reviews Online · 1990 · 236 citations
Law, Comparative Law, Jurisprudence +14
1–5 of 66
80
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement, Netherlands
2 publications · 62 citations
2
h-index
1
h-index
1–5 of 80
51

Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
96 citations
European University Institute
Florence, Italy
2 h-index
3 publications
57 citations
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 h-index
2 publications
82 citations
University of Kaiserslautern
Kaiserslautern, Germany
1 h-index
1 publications
46 citations

Florida Coastal School of Law
Jacksonville, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
50 citations
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
San Francisco, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
11 citations
Faculdades Guarulhos
Guarulhos, Brazil
1 h-index
1 publications
13 citations
Yale University
New Haven, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
31 citations
1–8 of 51
Repository · 6 publications · 190 citations
6
h-index
6 publications · 175 citations
6
h-index
2 publications · 440 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 30 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 78 citations
2
h-index
1–5