Comparative Judicial Methodology

Comparative Judicial Methodology is a systematic approach within legal scholarship that belongs to the genus of comparative legal methods and is distinguished by its focused analysis of judicial reasoning, interpretive techniques, and adjudicative practices across different legal systems to identify functional equivalences, differences, and potential harmonizations in the application of foreign law by domestic courts.

66

Publications

3.7K

Citations

80

Authors

51

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

8

Authors

80

  1. VV
    Vernon Valentine Palmer

    Tulane University, United States

    2 publications · 59 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. PL
    Peter Leyland

    London Metropolitan University, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 25 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. AH
    Andrew Harding

    University of Victoria, Canada

    2 publications · 25 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. GB
    Gerrit Betlem

    Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement, Netherlands

    2 publications · 62 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. JH
    Jaakko Husa

    University of Helsinki, Finland

    1 publications · 40 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 80

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 6 publications · 190 citations

    6

    h-index

  2. The American Journal of Comparative Law

    6 publications · 175 citations

    6

    h-index

  3. American Political Science Review

    2 publications · 440 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Utrecht Law Review

    2 publications · 30 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. International Journal of Constitutional Law

    2 publications · 78 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5