Comparative Constitutional Reasoning

Comparative Constitutional Reasoning is a systematic legal methodology that belongs to the broader field of comparative legal reasoning, specifically characterized by the analysis and juxtaposition of constitutional doctrines, principles, and judicial reasoning across different jurisdictions to identify structural, functional, and normative similarities and differences in constitutional interpretation and adjudication.

53

Publications

2.7K

Citations

52

Authors

37

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

10

Authors

52

  1. VC
    Vicki C. Jackson

    Georgetown University, United States

    3 publications · 71 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. RD
    Rosalind Dixon

    UNSW Sydney, Australia

    2 publications · 28 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. JB
    Jacco Bomhoff

    London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 57 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. SC
    Sujit Choudhry

    WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Germany

    2 publications · 145 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. AS
    Alec Stone Sweet

    Yale University, United States

    2 publications · 75 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 52

Venues

  1. International Journal of Constitutional Law

    7 publications · 393 citations

    7

    h-index

  2. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 6 publications · 183 citations

    6

    h-index

  3. The American Journal of Comparative Law

    4 publications · 90 citations

    4

    h-index

  4. German Law Journal

    3 publications · 100 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. Global Constitutionalism

    GlobCon · 2 publications · 32 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5