Comparative Bureaucratic Performance

Comparative Bureaucratic Performance is a scholarly construct in public administration that systematically evaluates and contrasts the efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of bureaucratic institutions across different national or institutional contexts to identify patterns, determinants, and implications of administrative variation.

45

Publications

4K

Citations

86

Authors

65

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

7

Authors

86

  1. PE
    Peter Evans

    University of California, Berkeley, United States

    2 publications · 1.3K citations

    2

    h-index

  2. FF
    Francis Fukuyama

    Stanford University, United States

    2 publications · 31 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. JE
    James E. Rauch

    University of California San Diego, United States

    2 publications · 1.3K citations

    2

    h-index

  4. FW
    Fred W. Ríggs

    Indiana University, United States

    2 publications · 89 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. JA
    Joseph A. Alutto

    University at Buffalo, State University of New York, United States

    1 publications · 24 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 86

Venues

  1. 4

    h-index

  2. Public Administration Review

    PAR · 3 publications · 67 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

    JPART · 2 publications · 179 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Choice Reviews Online

    CRO · 2 publications · 754 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Administrative Science Quarterly

    ASQ · 2 publications · 35 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5