Common Law Argumentation

Common Law Argumentation is a formal method of legal reasoning that derives judicial decisions through the application and extension of established precedents within a hierarchical system of case law.

29

Publications

1.1K

Citations

36

Authors

16

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

4

Authors

36

  1. KN
    Karl N. Llewellyn

    University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, United States

    5 publications · 442 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. PM
    Phan Minh Dũng

    Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand

    2 publications · 33 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. PM
    Phan Minh Thang

    Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand

    2 publications · 33 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. AR
    Adam Rigoni

    Arizona State University, United States

    1 publications · 30 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. RB
    Robert B. McKay

    Kodak (France), France

    1 publications · 93 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 36

Venues

  1. The American Journal of Comparative Law

    3 publications · 69 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. Columbia Law Review

    2 publications · 122 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 2 publications · 43 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Journal of Law and Society

    1 publications · 25 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Legal Theory

    1 publications · 30 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5